- cumstances. It would also be shown, he said, that the
defendant had suffered from temporary or emotional insanity for years.
"You must disabuse your minds, gentlemen of the jury," he began, "of any idea or impression that the defense in this case will rely upon anything but the constitution and the laws of the imperial state of New York. Upon these laws alone we will rely.
"You must dismiss all idea that we are to import into this case any so-called higher or unwritten law. We will rely upon all the defenses that the law allows.
"One of the defenses allowed by law is that of insanity."
Mr. Gleason declared further that it would be shown that Thaw acted in self-defense and without malice, believing threats had been made against him by Stanford White. Mr. Gleason said that Thaw did not know the nature or quality of his act at the time he committed it.
The defendant killed Stanford White, he said. He believed that it was an act of Providence and that he was guided in that act by Providence.
"The defendant killed White, and he did not know that act was wrong. He was suffering from a mental unsoundness proceeded from a disease so that he did not know what he was doing. We will show that there was a mental unsoundness in his family.
"There will be witnesses produced here on both
