Page:The Martyrdom of Ferrer.djvu/71

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.
THE REPLY OF CORRUPTION
65

in the Boletin for June, 1909, to provide the public with "sound and nutritious intellectual food." It was professedly Rationalistic in spirit. The Church was vitally interested in this project of "socialising science." But lest any should think that the aim was ineptly or fraudulently expressed, let me quote the titles of the whole of the projected works:—

  1. The Evolution of Worlds.
  2. The Story of the Earth.
  3. The Origin of Life.
  4. The Evolution of Living Things.
  5. The Factors of Organic Evolution.
  6. The Origin and Development of Man.
  7. Thought.
  8. The History of Civilisation.
  9. Religions.
  10. Law and Morals.
  11. Social Organisations.
  12. Economic Systems.
  13. The Evolution of Technics and Art.
  14. The Factors of Social Evolution.
  15. Man and the World.

The conception brings out once more the fact that Ferrer was a serious and very thoughtful teacher, and the idea recurs throughout the manifesto that this popular dissemination of science had for its aim "the improvement of the moral and physical condition of mankind." English readers must remember that the mere idea of "evolution" is anathema in Catholic Spain. To a Spanish priest this innocent and excellent programme was a plain emanation from the pit.

This manifesto was published, as I said, in the Boletin for June, 1909. At that time Ferrer was in England, and I must deal fully with his intentions and movements. We are within the advancing shadow of the great crime.

It was stated in the indictment against Ferrer that he made frequent visits to criminal and dangerous characters in other countries, chiefly Belgium, France, and England. I have had pleasant hours with his criminal associates in Paris, and I believe that the most dangerous of his Belgian habitués was the distinguished and fine-spirited Brussels barrister, M. Furnemont, whom I have occasionally met. But it will be most profitable to designate the dangerous criminals we harbour in this country, to whom Ferrer made his English visits. Most of them are personally known to me. I need only name them:—