resistance, but by his own prelates and barons.[1] His uncle Odo, Bishop of Bayeux, headed the first rebellion against him, as soon as he usurped the throne. William, Bishop of Durham, his own Minister, conspired against him. Bishop Gosfrith, with his nephew Robert, Earl of Northumberland, rebelled in the west. Roger Montgomery rose on the Welsh Marches. Roger Bigod in the eastern, and Hugo of Grentemesnil in the Midland Counties hoisted the flag of revolt.[2] Such was England at the beginning of his reign. In 1096, his own godfather, William de Aldrey, justly or unjustly, was accused of treason, and died on the gallows.[3] William, Count of Eu, kinsman to the King, suffered a worse fate for the same crime. His steward, William, also a kinsman of the King's, was hung on a rood. Eudes, Count of Champagne, forfeited his lands. Others not only shared the same fate, but were deprived of their eyesight.[4] His northern barons, headed by Robert of Mowbray, goaded to desperation by the Forest Laws, rose in revolt. Roger of Yvery, son of the Conqueror's favourite, led the Midland barons, and was obliged to fly, and all his vast estates, close to the New Forest, forfeited. Normandy, from whence Tiril had just come, swarmed with outlawed enemies, both churchmen and laymen. It was the nest where all the plots could be safely hatched.
Knowing all this, knowing, too, that the conspiracies became more frequent as his tyranny increased, we can scarcely avoid coming to but one conclusion as to his death.
It might suit the policy of the times to throw the guilt
- ↑ The Chronicle, Ed. Thorpe, vol. i. p. 356.
- ↑ William of Malmesbury, Ed. Hardy, tom, ii., lib. iv., sect. 306, p. 488.
- ↑ The same, tom., ii., lib. iv., sect. 319, p. 502.
- ↑ The Chronicle, Ed. Thorpe, vol. i. p. 362.
