Page:The New Latin Primer (Postgate).djvu/188

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
174
The New Latin Primer.

DEPENDENT SENTENCES.

The Sequence of Tenses.

§ 386. Primary Sequence.

Ōrăt mē ŭt sĭbĭ parcam He entreats me to spare him.
Tĭmĕō nĕ peccāvĕrīs I fear you have done wrong (also I fear you did wrong).
Vĭdĕō quĭd factūrŭs sīs(§ 232) I see what you will do.
Nōn effĭcĭĕt ut vĕnĭam He will not induce me to come.
Edāmŭs ut vīvāmŭs Let us eat to live.
Făcĭlĕ dīcam quĭd vĕlĭt I could easily say what he wants.
Rŏgā quĭd vērē sentĭăt Ask what he really thinks.

§ 387. Secondary Sequence.—

Ōrāvit mē ut sĭbĭ parcĕrem He entreated me to spare him.
Timēbam nē peccassēs I was afraid you had done wrong.
Vīdīquĭd factūrus essēs (§232) I saw what you would do.
Nōn effēcĕrăt ŭt vĕnirem He had not induced me to come.
Făcĭlĕ dīxissem quĭd vellĕ I could easily said what he wanted.
Dīcĭs tē rŏgāssĕ quĭd vērē sentīrĕt You say that you asked what he really thought.

§ 388. Note the following differences from English :

{a) The Imperfect Subjunctive in Conditional statements, even when it refers to present time [§ 242(a)], takes Secondary tenses.

Nĭsĭ ĭneptum pŭtārem, iūrārem mē ĕă sentīrĕ quae dicĕem If I did not think it out of place, I would take an oath that I believe what I say.

(b) The Present in General Statements (§ 177) is usually changed to the Imperfect after Secondary tenses.

Dē phĭlŏsŏphĭā quantō ŏpĕrĕ expĕtendă essĕt ĭn ălĭo lĭbrō dissĕrŭimŭs We discussed in another treatise how greatly philosophy is to be sought after.

(c) The Perfect Subjunctive, when it refers to the Future (§§ 225 (C), 240), of course takes Primary tenses.