?I? RECOKDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION Saturday MADISON DETAIl, OF AYES AI? NOES aye ?y� aye laye no aye aye aye aye aye aye To agre? to ]V[r Ran- dolph's amendment to the ISt clau?, Iat ?c- ?on, 7 a?e. no no aye ino no no no no no no no Toagreetotheamendmt of yc 1st clause I sect. aye aye aye no no no aye no aye ?ye aye To a? ? the am?d- men? o? ?o year?. aye aye aye no no no aye no aye aye ?ye To agree to the ?rst clau?e o? ye ? o{ eleven ?td on the jo?- hal =% inst? no no ?ye no no dd aye no no aye to agree ?o ?r Sher- man*s areenfant aye aye aye aye aye aye aye ayeayeaye To add ?e w? ? other pub: ?inlste? aye aye aye aye aye no aye aye aye aye ?o strike out the words "torrespond ?th ? no no aye? no no no no no no no aye no ? no no l no aye no aye aye no but his pardon shall not ? pleadable in bar [3651 [3661 [3671 [3681 [3691 [:?7?1 MADISON Saturday August. 2 5. 787-- In Convention The Ist. clause of i sect. of art: VII being reconsidered ? Col. Mason objected to the term, ".rhall"--fullill the en- gagements & discharge the debts &c as too strong. It may be impossible to comply with it. The Creditors should be kept in the same plight. They will in one respect be necessarily and properly in a better. The Government will be more able Upon this subject, see above August x8 (with references under note 6), August ?x--24, and Appendix A, CCV, CCXII, CCLII, CCLIV, CCLVI, CCI?VIII, CCC1.XXIL
�
