Page:The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 Volume 3.djvu/290

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

could be safely entrusted to the old Congress;’ on the contrary, I opposed many of the powers as being of that nature that, in my opinion, they could not be entrusted to any government whatever consistent with the freedom of the states and their citizens, and I earnestly recommended, what I wish my fellow citizens deeply to impress on your minds, that in altering or amending our federal government no greater powers ought to be given than experience has shown to be necessary, since it will be easy to delegate further power when time shall dictate the expediency or necessity, but powers once bestowed upon a government, should they be found ever so dangerous or destructive to freedom, cannot be resumed or wrested from government but by another revolution.


ⅭⅩⅭⅡ. Luther Martin’s Reply to the Landholder.[1]

Baltimore, March 19, 1788.

In the recognition which the Landholder professes to make ‘of what occurred to my advantage,’ he equally deals in the arts of misrepresentation, as while he was ‘only the record of the bad,’ and I am equally obliged from a regard to truth to disclaim his pretended approbation as his avowed censure. He declares that I originated the clause which enacts that ‘this Constitution and the laws of the United States, which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, any thing in the Constitution or the laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.’ To place this matter in a proper point of view, it will be necessary to state, that as the propositions were reported by the committee of the whole house, a power was given to the general government to negative the laws passed by the state legislatures, a power which I considered as totally inadmissible; in substitution of this I proposed the following clause, which you will find very materially different from the clause adopted by the Constitution, ‘that the legislative acts of the United States, made by virtue and in pursuance of the articles of the union, and all treaties made and ratified under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the respective states, so far as those acts or treaties shall relate to the said states or their citizens, and that the judiciaries of the several states shall be bound thereby in their decisions, any thing in the respective laws of the individual

  1. P.L. Ford, Essays on the Constitution, 360–371; first printed in the Maryland Journal, March 21, 1788. For the origin of this controversy see above ⅭⅬⅦ, ⅭⅬⅫ, ⅭⅬⅩⅩⅤ, ⅭⅬⅩⅩⅩⅨⅭⅩⅭⅠ, see also ⅭⅩⅭⅨ.