Page:The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787 Volume 3.djvu/315

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

ⅭⅭⅨ. James Madison in the Virginia Convention.[1]

June 12, 1788.

The congressional proceedings are to be occasionally published, including all receipts and expenditures of public money, of which no part can be used, but in consequence of appropriations made by law. This is a security which we do not enjoy under the existing system. That part which authorises the government to withhold from the public knowledge what in their judgment may require secrecy, is imitated from the confederation—that very system which the gentleman advocates.




ⅭⅭⅩ. Debate in the Virginia Convention.[2]

June 14, 1788.

(The 4th and 5th sections read.)

Mr. Monroe wished that the honorable gentleman, who had been in the federal convention, would give information respecting the clause concerning elections. He wished to know why congress had an ultimate controul over the time, place, and manner of elections of representatives, and the time and manner of that of senators; and also why there was an exception as to the place of electing senators.

Mr. Madison.—Mr. Chairman,—The reason of the exception was, that if congress could fix the place of choosing the senators, it might compel the state legislatures to elect them in a different place from that of their usual sessions, which would produce some inconvenience, and was not necessary for the object of regulating elections. But it was necessary to give the general government a controul over the time and manner of choosing the senators, to prevent its own dissolution.

With respect to the other point, it was thought that the regulation of time, place, and manner of electing the representatives, should be uniform throughout the continent. Some states might regulate the elections on the principles of equality, and others might regulate them otherwise. This diversity would be obviously unjust. Elections are regulated now unequally in some states, particularly South Carolina, with respect to Charleston, which is represented by 30 members.—Should the people of any state, by any means be deprived of the right of suffrage, it was judged proper that it should be remedied by the general government. It was found impossible to fix the time, place, and manner, of the election of representatives in the constitu-

  1. Robertson, Debates of the Convention of Virginia, 1788 (2d edit., 1805), p. 236.
  2. Robertson, Debates of the Convention of Virginia, 1788 (2d edit., 1805), pp. 261–290.