THE SCIEyTIFIC MOXTIII.Y
��. llnoKKI
also there liave lieeti ilistiuguitihed leail- Hketches psj-ohologists aa follows from
ers, but, on the whole, the tout riliiit ion the different nstionB: United States,
of that country la st'ienee has oome 95; Germanj,;i7: Great Britain, .10;
from the large nunilier of individuals Austria-Hungary. 13; France. 12;
engaged in scientific research at the Italy, 12; SwitMrlanil, 10; Russia, Hol-
uiiiversities. In the past the United |an,| ^mi Norway, each 6. States has not produced scientific lead- f„ „„ f„ ^s the apparent su]«?rior-
er, comparable to English scientific jfj ^f America in psychology is due to
men of the nineteenth century or uum- ,^g f^^^ ^^^^^ .^^ j^ „ „^^ ^-iew^, the
Iws of able investigators equal to those ^.^^^j^^ ^^^ ^^^^ j^,,^,^^ j„ j,,^^^ directio.i*
of Germany. But it may be that we .^ ,,^j emphasized. We are pronding have l)een gradually assuming a position . ■, c i. i - n .u
, , , opportunity for research work in all the
in which we are con tri but nig to the . c ■ . .i .
, . .. ■ r n sciences, and me may be confident that
advancement o* scipnce nn tprma of '
science with which the writer of this
note ie concerned may be takeu as an
example, it may be clain.,Hi that we |.ro- "'<"'^. "' *« K'^"* ""t'""" "^ ^""1*
diu-ed in William .lames the greatest ""at peculiar resiKinsibility is thrown
contemporary psychologist, and we ay- "I""' >"•■ We may also hope that the
I*ar to have more competent workers IP«»oii of the war to us will be thai the
in psychology than any other nation. I>est preparation:
"Who's Who in Science" an English development of ■
publication, select w for biographical!
��' ... .. ,. Te .1. 'be ability exists and only
with these nations. If the ...
��? to exhibit itself. The war v >ple the resources iu men a
�� �
