Page:The battle of the books - Guthkelch - 1908.djvu/376

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

302 BIBLIOGRAPHY

an Honest Vindication of Tho. Stanley, Esquire, and his Notes on Callimachus. To which are added, Some other Observa- tions on that Poet. In a Letter to the Honourable Charles Boyle, Esq ; With a Postscript, in Relation to Dr Bentley's late Book against him. To which is added an Appendix, by the Bookseller ; wherein the Doctor's Mis-Representations of all the Matters of Fact wherein he is concern'd, in his late Book about Phalaris's Epistles, are modestly consider'd ; with a Letter from the Honourable Charles Boyle, Esq ; on that Subject.

quum repetitum venerit una

Grex avium plumas, risum Cornicla movebit, Furtivis nudata Coloribus

When all the Birds shall claim their own. And every borrow'd Feather's flown. How mean the Jackdaw looks, for all is gone !

. . . 1699. [1086. i. 2 (2).]

[See Jebb's Bentley, pp. 76-7.]

(17) An Answer to a late Book written against the Learned

and Reverend Dr Bentley, relating to some Manuscript Notes

on Callimachus. Together with an Examination of Mr Bennet's

Appendix to the said Book. . . . 1699. [^99* ^* 5 (^)-]

[On the page following the Preface to the Reader is an

Advertisement, " Lately publish'd the Epistles of Phalaris,

translated into English from the Original, by the Author of

this ANSWERS Solomon Whateley is supposed to have

written this book (Monk's 5^«r/y (ed. 1833), Vol. I. p. 131).

If he wrote the first of the two translations of Phalaris

mentioned above (14), it would be interesting to know why

�� �