Page:The evolution of marriage and of the family ... (IA evolutionofmarri00letorich).pdf/200

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

"They were hard in their bargains, with the exception of one only, in which they seemed very reasonable and very generous. They agreed to give rather than sell their favours, alleging that long solicitations on one side and refusals on the other wasted time that might be more agreeably employed."[1] It is clear from this that the monogamic régime of the Abyssinians is more apparent than real, that it is much modified by the extreme cicisbeism, by the use of concubines, of which I have already spoken, and lastly by the abuse of divorce, turning it into a successive polygamy. V. Monogamy among the Mongols of Asia.

Among the Asiatic Mongols monogamy is also not very strict. In Thibetan Himalaya polyandry seems to predominate. It is not rare, either, in Thibet proper, where, on the other hand, polygamy is not forbidden, for there is no rigid legislation in regard to marriage. Besides, in these countries, as in many others, girls enjoy complete liberty before marriage, and they use it without suffering at all in reputation.[2]

It is singular that in Lamaïc Thibet, in full theocracy, in a country where the prayers and the practices of religion enter into nearly all the actions of civil life, marriage escapes all ecclesiastical interference. In fact, the priests have nothing to do with it, and all the matrimonial ceremony, which is purely laïc, consists in a simple mutual engagement entered into by the interested parties before witnesses.[3]

This laïc anarchy of marriage in Thibet must no doubt be attributed to Lamaïc bigotry itself. The Lamas avoid women, holding marriage in contempt, and all the great functionaries, as well as many Thibetans of the other classes, are of the same opinion.[4] Religion does not concern herself with it; she disdains it, as in Egypt, which seems to show that a sufficient degree of religious

  1. Bruce, loc. cit., t. xxiii. p. 255.
  2. Turner, Hist. Univ. des Voy., t. xxxi. p. 437.
  3. Id., ibid. t. xxxi. pp. 437, 454.
  4. Id., ibid. p. 435.