Page:The reign of William Rufus and the accession of Henry the First.djvu/218

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

Dispute between Stephen and the King.

The King's compromise with Stephen's father. between the King and the neophyte, in which Rufus, remembering perhaps the one redeeming feature in his own life, pressed Stephen's return to Judaism as a matter of filial duty. The youth humbly suggests that the King is joking. Rufus waxes wroth, and takes to words of abuse and to his usual oath. Stephen's eyes shall be torn out, if he does not presently obey his bidding.[1] The youth stands firm, and even rebukes the King. He can be no good Christian who, instead of trying to win to Christ those who are estranged from him, strives to drive back those who have already embraced his faith. Rufus, put to shame by the answer, has nothing to say, but drives Stephen from his presence with scorn.[2] The Jew father is waiting without. His son overwhelms him with words of abuse which even zeal for his new faith would hardly justify. He would no longer acknowledge a father in one whose own father was the Devil, and who, not satisfied with his own damnation, sought the damnation of his son.[3] With this somewhat harsh way of putting matters, the zealous youth vanishes from the story; the Jew father has yet another turn with the Red King. He is called in, and Rufus says that he has done what he had been asked to do, and demands the promised payment for his pains.[4] The Jew expostulates. His son, he says, is firmer than ever in his Christian faith and in his hatred towards himself. Yet the King says that he has done what

  1. Eadmer, u.s. "Tecum jocarer, stercoris fili? Recede potius et præceptum meum velocius imple, alioquin per vultum de Luca faciam tibi oculos erui." On the oath, see Appendix G.
  2. Ib. "Confusus princeps in istis, contumeliis affectum juvenem cum dedecore jussit suis conspectibus eliminari."
  3. Ib. "Fili mortis et pabulum externæ perditionis, non sufficit tibi damnatio tua, nisi et me tecum præcipites in eam? Ego vero cui jam Christus patefactus est absit ut te unquam pro patre agnoscam, quia pater tuus diabolus est." The reference must be to St. John viii. 44; but the pedigree was a dangerous one for a presumptive grandson to meddle with.
  4. Ib. "Ecce feci quod rogasti, redde quod promisisti."