Page:The reign of William Rufus and the accession of Henry the First.djvu/307

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

Danger of the example of Rouen.

Others who help Robert.

November 3, 1090.

Henry at Rouen. claims of kings, dukes, and counts. Robert of Bellême may indeed have simply hastened to any quarter from which the scent of coming slaughter greeted him. But Henry the Clerk could always have given a reason for anything that he did. Popular movements at Rouen might supply dangerous precedents at Coutances. The Count of Coutances too might have better hopes of becoming Duke of Rouen, if Rouen were still held for a while by such a prince as Robert, than he could have if the city became either the seat of a powerful commonwealth or the stronghold of a powerful king. But, from whatever motive, Henry came, and he was the first to come.[1] Others to whom the Duke's messengers set forth his desolate state[2] came also. Robert of Bellême, so lately his prisoner, Count William of Evreux and his nephew William of Breteuil, all hastened, if not to the deliverance of Duke Robert, at least to the overthrow of Conan. And with them came Reginald of Warren, the younger son of William and Gundrada,[3] and Gilbert of Laigle, fresh from his victory over his mightiest comrade.[4] At the beginning of November Duke Robert was still in the castle of Rouen; but his brother Henry was now with him within its walls, and the captains who had come to his help were thundering at the gates of the rebellious city.

Rouen in the eleventh century. The Rouen of those days, like the Le Mans, the York, and the Lincoln, of those days, was still the Roman city, the old Rothomagus. As in those and in countless other cases, large and populous suburbs had spread themselves over the neighbouring country; at Rouen, as at York,

  1. Ord. Vit. 690 A. "Henricus igitur primus ei suppetias venit, et primo subsidium fratri contulit, deinde vindictam viriliter in proditorem exercuit."
  2. Ib. "Fidelibus suis desolationem sui cita legatione intimavit."
  3. Ib. See above, p. 76, and N. C. vol. iv. p. 654.
  4. See above, p. 242. He was killed next year. See Ord. Vit. 685 B.