Henry;
Eadgar.
Eadgar banished from Normandy.
William's policy towards as the first of the new race who had any claim to the privileges of kingly birth. We must always remember that, in English eyes, Henry, the son of a crowned King of the English, born of his crowned Lady on English ground, had a claim which was not shared by his brothers, foreign born sons of a mere Norman Duke and Duchess.[1] The kingly and native birth of Henry might put his claims at least on a level with those of Eadgar, who, male heir of Ecgberht and Cerdic as he was, was born of uncrowned parents in a foreign land.[2] Indeed it might seem that by this time all thoughts of a restoration of the West-Saxon house had passed out of the range of practical politics, and that the claims of Eadgar were no longer entitled to a thought. The Red King however seems to have deemed otherwise. He was clearly determined to secure himself against the remotest chances of danger. Henry was to be despoiled; Eadgar was to be banished. Eadgar had come back from Apulia;[3] he was now living in Normandy on terms of the closest friendship with the Duke, who had enriched him with grants of land, and, as we have seen, admitted him to his inmost counsels.[4] We know not whether Eadgar had given the Red King any personal offence, or whether William was simply jealous of him as a possible rival for the crown. At any rate, whether by a formal clause of the treaty or not, he called on Robert to confiscate Eadgar's Norman estates and to make him leave his dominions.[5] Neither towards Henry nor towards Eadgar would the policy of William Rufus seem to have been wise; but
- ↑ See N. C. vol. iv. pp. 288, 796.
- ↑ Ib. vol. iii. p. 7; see vol. ii. p. 376.
- ↑ Ib. vol. iv. p. 694.
- ↑ We have seen him already as a counsellor; see above, p. 220. Orderic, giving a picture of him some years later (778 B), adds that "ducem sibi coævum et quasi collectaneum fratrem diligebat."
- ↑ See Appendix M.
