Case of Peterborough. 1098.
English abbots.
Story of the appointment to an unnamed abbey. The abbeys therefore were likely to remain vacant longer than the bishoprics. When they were filled, it was not without simony, or at least not without a payment of some kind to the King. For it is rather harsh to apply the word simony to the payment by which the monks of Peterborough bought of the King the right to choose an abbot freely—a free congé d'élire in short, without any letter missive.[1] Another thing may be noticed. The bishops appointed at this time all bear Norman names; Normans were the most likely men to find their way into the King's chapel and chancery. But the abbots are still not uncommonly English.[2] Rufus, who welcomed brave mercenaries from any quarter, also welcomed bribes from any quarter, with little of narrow prejudice for or against particular nations. An English monk was as likely as his Norman fellow to have, by some means quite inconsistent with his rule, scraped together money enough to purchase preferment. And when a body of monks bought the right of free election, they were likely to choose an Englishman rather than a stranger. At all times the kings interfered less with the elections to abbeys than they did with the elections to bishoprics.[3] And, if there is any truth, even as a legendary illustration, in a tale which is told both of Rufus and of other kings, there were moments when the Red King could prefer a practical joke to a bribe. An abbey—the name is not given—is vacant; two of its monks come to the King, trying to outbid one another in offers of money for the vacant office. A third brother
- ↑ See N. C. vol. v. p. 224.
- ↑ Ib.
- ↑ See Stubbs, Const. Hist. vol. iii. pp. 318, 319. He gives amongst the reasons for the difference; "The abbots were not so influential as the bishops in public affairs, nor was the post equally desirable as the reward for public service; with a very few exceptions the abbacies were much poorer than the bishoprics, and involved a much more steady attention to local duties, which would prevent attendance at court."
