No reference to the Pope in English episcopal appointments. without saying anything about the papal question at all. It was not yet held that the Bishop of Rome was entitled to any voice as to the election, investiture, or consecration, of any English bishop. In the case of a diocesan bishop, there was no need for any reference to the Pope at any stage; in the case of a metropolitan, the pallium had to be asked for; but it was not asked for till after consecration. Anselm had given fair warning to the King that he meant to acknowledge Urban. But at no stage of the business which had yet been reached was there any need for any formal acknowledgement of any Pope. Anselm might therefore fairly hold that his first warning was enough, and that he was not called upon to raise the question again, till the time came when it would be his duty to seek for the pallium from one Pope or the other. When that time came, he would be ready to do or suffer as the circumstances of that yet future day might dictate.
Order of episcopal appointments.
Opposite present practice.
Before the time for any dealings with Rome should
come, there were still two more ceremonies to be done
in England. The process of making a bishop was, then
as now, a long one; but the order of the several stages
was different then from what it now is. Anselm had
done homage and had received restitution of the temporalities;
but he was not yet enthroned, still less
consecrated. The order then was, homage, enthronement,
consecration. The present order is the exact opposite.
The bishop-elect is consecrated; then he takes corporal
possession of the see by enthronement; last of all, he
does homage to the King and receives restitution of the
temporalities. In the elder state of things the spiritual
office was bestowed on one who was already full bishop
for all temporal purposes. By the later rule the temporal
rights are bestowed on one who is already full bishop
