Anselm's answer. he would not withdraw his where it was also due. But he would not deal by them as they dealt by him. He would still show them the love of a brother and a father; he would do what he could for them, as brethren and sons of the church of Canterbury, to bring them back from their error into the right way. And whereas the King withdrew from him all protection and would no longer acknowledge him as father and archbishop, he would still discharge to the King every earthly duty that lay upon him, and, so far as the King would let him,[1] he would still do his duty for the care of the King's soul. Only he would, for God's service, still keep the name, power, and office, of Archbishop of Canterbury, whatever might be the oppression in outward things that it might bring upon him.
The King turns again to the lay lords. His words were reported to the King.[2] We are again admitted to witness the scene in the presence-chamber. The bishops had proved broken reeds; William would make one more appeal to the lay nobles. "Everything that he says," began the King, "is against my pleasure, and no one shall be my man who chooses to be his.[3] Wherefore, you who are the great men of my kingdom, do you, as the bishops have done, withdraw from him all faith and friendship, that he may know how little he gains by the faith which he keeps to the Apostolic See in defiance of my will." But the lay lords were not like the bishops; one would like to know by what mouth they made their calm and logical answer. They drew a clear distinction between spiritual and temporal allegiance.
- ↑ Eadmer, Hist. Nov. 30. "Paterno more diligentiam, animæ illius curam, si ferre dignabitur, habebo."
- ↑ "Ad hæc ille respondit," says Eadmer; but it can only mean an answer through messengers, as it is plain that the King and the Archbishop were still in different rooms.
- ↑ "Omnino adversatur animo meo quod dicit, nec meus erit, quisquis ipsius esse delegerit."
