Political bearing of William's accession. Robert had as yet shown his worst side and William his best. There could be little room for doubt between the man who had fought against his father and the man who had risked his life to save his father. And, besides this, the accession of William would separate England and Normandy. England would again have, if not a king of her own blood, yet at least a king of her own. The island world would again be the island world, no longer dependent on, or mixed up with, the affairs of the world beyond the sea. The harshness which had again thrust back Morkere and Wulfnoth into prison might be passed by, as an act of necessary precaution. Morkere too might by this time be well nigh forgotten, and Wulfnoth had never been known. If a native king was not to be had, William Rufus was at the moment by no means the most unpromising among possible foreign kings.
No real choice.
Employment of the treasure.
But in truth neither Normans nor Englishmen were
in this case called on to make any real choice. Both
were called on, somewhat after the manner of the sham
plebiscita of modern France, to acknowledge a sovereign
who was already in possession. Whatever might have
been the abstract preference of the Normans for Robert
or of the English for Henry, neither party felt at the
moment that degree of zeal which would lead them to
brave the dangers of opposition. At any rate, William
Rufus was a new king, and a new king is commonly
welcome. Men of both races might reasonably expect
that the rule of one who had come peacefully to his
crown would be less harsh than that of one who had
made his entry by the sword. It is further hinted that
William partly owed his recognition to his early possession
of his father's hoard, perhaps to his careful discharge
of his father's will, perhaps, even thus early in his reign, to
