Page:Title 3 CFR 2002 Compilation.djvu/239

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.

EO 13262 Title 3--The President "2002 Amendment: The amendment clearly defines the authority of spe- cial and summary courts-martial to adjudge both fines and forfeitures. See generally United States v. Tualla, 52 M.]. 228 (2000)." g. The Analysis accompanying R.C.M. 1003(b)(7) is amended by adding at the end the following now paragraph: "2002 Amendment: This change resulted from the enactment of Article 56a, UCM], in section 581 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year ]998, Pub. L. No. \17705-85, \177l Stat. ]629, ]759 (]997).". h. The Analysis accompanying R.C.M. \177004(0) is amended by adding at the end the following now paragraph: "2002 Amendment: This change resulted from the enactment of Article 56a, UCM], in section 581 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year ]998, Pub. L. No. \17705-85, \177l Stat. ]629, ]759 (]997).". i. The Analysis accompanying R.C.M. \177006(c) is amended by adding at the end the following now paragraph: "2002 Amendment: This change to the discussion resulted from the en- actment of Article 56a, UCM], in section 581 of the National Defense Au- thorization Act for Fiscal Year \177998, Pub. L. No. \17705-85, \177l Stat. \177629, 1759 (1997).". j. The Analysis accompanyin\365 R.C.M. 1006(d) is amended by insertin\365 after the analysis of subsection 3(A) followin\365 para\365raph: "2002 Amendment: Subsection (d)(4)(t\177) was amended as a result of the enactment of Article 56a, UCMJ, in section 581 of the National Defense Au- thorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-85, ill Star. 1629, 1759 (1997).". k. The Analysis accompanyin\365 R.C.M. \177009 is amended by addin\365 at the end the followin S new para\365raph: "2002 Amendment: Subsection (e)(3)(t\177)(ii) was amended as a result of the enactment of Article 56a, UCMJ, in section 581 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1998, Pub. L. No. 105-85, ill Star. 1629, 1759 (1997).". 1. The Analysis to R.C.M. \177103 (b)(2) is amended by addin\365 at the end the followin S new para\365raph: "2002 Amendment: Subsection (b)(2)(t\177) was amended to implement the amendment to \1770 U.S.C. \365 8\1779 (Article \1779, UCM\177) contained in section 577 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, P. L. No. 106-65, ll3 Star. 5\1772 (1999) increasin\365 the jurisdictional maximum pun- ishment at special courts-martial. R.C.M. l103(b)(2)(t\177) was amended to pre- vent an inconsistent requirement for a verbatim transcript between a \365en- eral court-martial and a special court-martial when the adjudged sentence of a general court-martial does not include a punitive discharge or confine- ment greater than six months, but does include forfeiture of two-thirds pay per month for more than six months but not more than 12 months.". m. The Analysis to R.C.M. 1103(c) is amended by adding at the end the following now paragraph: "2002 Amendment: Subsection (c) was amended to implement the amendment to 10 U.S.C. \365 819 (Article 19, UCMJ) contained in section 577 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2000, P. L. No. 106-65, 113 Stat. 512 (1999) increasing the jurisdictional maximum pun- 226