lineated by Dr Halley, he was staggered upon considering that the whole distance, which employed a vessel in Solomon's time for three years, was a thousand leagues, scarcely more than the work of a month. He, therefore, supposes, that the reason of delay was owing to the imperfection of the vessels, and goes into very ingenious calculations, reasonings, and conclusions thereupon. He conjectures, therefore, that the ships employed by Solomon were what he calls junks *[1] of the Red Sea, made of papyrus, and covered with hides or leather.
Pliny †[2] had said, that one of these junks of the Red Sea was twenty days on a voyage, which a Greek or Roman vessel would have performed in seven; and Strabo ‡[3] had said the same thing before him.
This relative slowness, or swiftness, will not solve the difficulty. For, if these junks ║[4] were the vessels employed to Ophir, the long voyage, much more they would have been employed on the short one, to and from India; now they performed this within a year, which was all a Roman or Greek vessel could do, therefore this was not the cause. Those employed by Solomon were Tyrian and Idumean vessels, the best ships and sailers of their age. Whoever has seen the prodigious swell, the violent currents, and strong south-westers beyond the Straits of Babelmandeb, will not need any argument to persuade him, that no vessel made of papyrus, or leather, could live an hour upon that sea. The
- ↑ * Vide L'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxi. cap. 6. p. 476.
- ↑ † Plin. lib. vi. cap. 22.
- ↑ ‡ Strabo, lib. xv.
- ↑ ║ I know there are contrary opinions, and the junks might have been yarious. Vide Salm.
- Vide L'Esprit des Loix, liv. xxi. cap. 6. p. 476.
† Plin. lib. vi. cap. 22. ‡ Strabo, lib. xv. ║ I know there are contrary opinions, and the junks might have been yarious. Vide Salm.
