Page:Turkey, the great powers, and the Bagdad Railway.djvu/109

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
  • [Footnote: *nitzer's plan, however, unquestionably was the railway from

Alexandretta to the Persian Gulf—i.e., the Syrian and Mesopotamian, not the Anatolian and Cilician, sections. Furthermore, there were political objectives connected with the Rechnitzer proposal which, however attractive to British imperialists, could not have been regarded with equanimity by the Sultan. The following are typical quotations from Mr. Rechnitzer's prospectus: "It has long been the object of English statesmen to consolidate the position of England in the Persian Gulf, where British interests (both political and commercial) are now paramount. With a railway in this region controlled by British interests . . . a very strong foothold would accrue to British influence" (p. 12). Among the advantages of the proposed railway are listed the following (pp. 17-18): "It will place under British control two important ports, one on the Mediterranean and the other on the Persian Gulf; it will strengthen British influence in Turkey and in the Persian Gulf, and indirectly, in Persia and Afghanistan; it will afford England powerful means of exercising her influence over the territory of Central Persia, and of establishing new commercial enterprises over an enormous area of unexploited country of exceptional wealth."]*