Page:US District Court, Southern District of New York.-Liberty Reserve Indictment.pdf/26

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.

SUBSTITUTE ASSET PROVISION

44. If any of the above—described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission of the defendant:

(1) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence;
(2) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third person;
(3) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court;
(4) has been substantially diminished in value; or
(5) has been commingled with other property which cannot be subdivided without difficulty;

it is the intent of the United States, pursuant to Title 18 United States Code, Section 9821b} and Title 21, United states Code, Section B53(p), to seek forfeiture of any other property of the defendant up to the value of the above—described forfeitable property.

(Title 18, United States Code, Section 982 and Title 21, United States Code, section 853.)


 
Foreperson

A personal signature appears here


PREET BHARARA
United States Attorney

A personal signature appears here


JAIKUMAR RAMASWAMY
Chief, Asset Forfeiture and Money Laundering section, Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice