106 STAT. 2364 PUBLIC LAW 102-484—OCT. 23, 1992 (1) shall be merged with and be available for the same purposes and the same period as the amounts in the accounts to which transferred; (2) shall be deemed to increase the amount authorized to be appropriated for the account to which the amount is transferred by an amount equal to the amount trcuisferred; and (3) may not be expended for an item that has been denied authorization of appropriations by Congress. (e) RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER TRANSFER AUTHORITY.— An increase under subsection (d)(2) in an amount authorized to be appropriated is in addition to an increase in that amount that results from a transfer of an authorization of appropriations pursuant to section 1001. Subtitle B—Limitations SEC. 311. PROHIBITION ON THE USE OF CERTAIN FUNDS FOR PENTA- GON RESERVATION. (a) PROHIBITION. -^!) Except as provided in paragraph (3), none of the funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1993 may be used to contribute to the Pentagon Reservation Msdntenance Revolving Fund for any purpose other than for the actual and necessary day-to-day operation of the Pentagon Reservation, including complying with nealth and safety requirements. (2) None of the funds appropriated pursuant to authorizations provided in this Act or any other Act may be transferred to the Pentagon Reservation Maintenance Revolving Fund for the purpose of renovation. (3) Funds appropriated to the Department of Defense for fiscal year 1993 may be used for replacement of the central heating and cooling plant located on the Pentagon Reservation. (b) REPORT. — Not later than April 15, 1993, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the congressional defense committees a report setting forth a revised renovation program for the Pentagon Reservation. Such program shall— (1) provide justification for the scope and timing of any renovation of the Pentagon Reservation based upon— (A) the long-term administrative space requirements of the Department of Defense in the National Capital Region; (B) requirements directly concerned with health and Bafety; and (C) the most cost-effective options to meet the requirements described in subparagraphs (A) and (B); (2) specifically address the need and economic justification for any expansion of the Pentagon; (3) address the practicality and cost of any renovation of the Pentagon Reservation without relocating significant numbers of employees; and (4) update the 1988 National Capital Region Master Development Plan of the Department of Defense, providing justification for the current and future need for defense activities in the National Capital Region and outlining options to meet the facility needs of the Department of Defense based upon the force structure and personnel strengths planned for fiscal years 1994 through 1998.
�
