Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 106 Part 6.djvu/49

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
This page needs to be proofread.


PUBLIC LAW 102-575—OCT. 30, 1992 106 STAT. 4607 is not authorized to obligate or expend amounts in excess of $214,352,000 for the features identified in the Report of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources accompanying the bill H.R. 429. This additional sum shall be available solely for desi^, engineering, and construction of the facilities identified in title II of this Act and for the planning and implementation of the fish and wildlife and recreation mitigation and conservation projects and studies authorized in titles III and IV of this Act, and for the Ute Indian Settlement authorized in title V of this Act. (2) APPLICATION OF INSPECTOR GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS. — Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, the Secretary shall implement all the recommendations contained in the report entitled "Review of the Financial Management of the Colorado River Storage Project, Bureau of Reclamation (Report No. 88 -45, February 1988)", prepared by the Inspector General of the Department of the Interior, with respect to the funds authorized to be appropriated in this section. (b) UTAH RECLAMATION PROJECTS AND FEATURES NOT TO BE FUNDED. — Notwithstanding the Act of April 11, 1956 (70 Stat. 110; 43 U.S.C. 105), the Act of August 10, 1972 (86 Stat. 525; 43 U.S.C. 620k note), the Act of October 19, 1980 (94 Stat. 2239; 43 U.S.C. 620), and the Act of October 31, 1988 (102 Stat. 2826), funds may not be made available, obligated, or expended for the following Utah reclamation projects and features: (1) Fish and wildlife features: (A) The dam in Bjorkman Hollow. (B) The Deep Creek pumping plant. (C) The North Fork pumping plant. (2) Water development projects and features: (A) Mosida pumping plant, canals, and laterals. (B) Draining of Benjamin Slough. (C) Diking of Groshen or Prove Bays in Utah Lake. (D) Ute Indian Unit. (E) Leland Bench development. (F) All features of the Bonneville Unit, Central Utah Project not proposed and described in the 1988 Definite Plan Report. Counties in which the projects and features described in this subsection were proposed to be located may participate in the local development projects provided for in section 206. (c) TERMINATION OF AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— Not- 43 USC 620k withstanding any provision of the Act of April 11, 1956 (70 Stat. "°*® 110; 43 U.S.C. 620k), the Act of September 2, 1964 (78 Stat. 852), the Act of September 30, 1968 (82 Stat. 885), the Act of August 10, 1972 (86 Stat. 525; 43 U.S.C. 620k note), and the Act of October 31, 1988 (102 Stat. 2826) to the contrary, the authorization of appropriations for construction of any Colorado River Storage Project participating project located in the State of Utah sh^l terminate five years after the date of enactment of this Act unless: (1) the Secretary executes a cost-sharing agreement with the District for construction of such project, and (2) the Secretary has requested, or the Congress has appropriated, construction funds for such project. (d) USE OF APPROPRIATED FUNDS. —Funds authorized pursuant to this Act shall be appropriated to the Secretary and such appropriations shall be made immediately available in their entirety