Page:United States Statutes at Large Volume 121.djvu/1279

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page needs to be proofread.
[121 STAT. 1258]
PUBLIC LAW 110-000—MMMM. DD, 2007
[121 STAT. 1258]

121 STAT. 1258

PUBLIC LAW 110–114—NOV. 8, 2007 for flood control, Buffalo Bayou and tributaries, Texas, authorized by section 101(a)(21) of the Water Resources Development Act of 1990 (104 Stat. 4610). ‘‘(17) MENOMONEE RIVER WATERSHED, WISCONSIN.—The project for the Menomonee River Watershed, Wisconsin, including— ‘‘(A) the Underwood Creek diversion facility project (Milwaukee County Grounds); and ‘‘(B) the Greater Milwaukee Rivers watershed project.’’.

SEC. 5158. ADDITIONAL ASSISTANCE FOR CRITICAL PROJECTS.

dkrause on GSDDPC44 with PUBLAW

Section 219 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1992 (106 Stat. 4835; 110 Stat. 3757; 113 Stat. 334; 113 Stat. 1494; 114 Stat. 2763A–219; 119 Stat. 2255) is amended— (1) in subsection (c)(5) by striking ‘‘a project for the elimination or control of combined sewer overflows’’ and inserting ‘‘projects for the design, installation, enhancement, or repair of sewer systems’’; (2) in subsection (e)(1) by striking ‘‘$20,000,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$32,500,000’’; and (3) in subsection (f)— (A) by striking the undesignated paragraph relating to Charleston, South Carolina, and inserting the following: ‘‘(72) CHARLESTON, SOUTH CAROLINA.—$10,000,000 for wastewater infrastructure, including wastewater collection systems, and stormwater system improvements, Charleston, South Carolina.’’; (B) by redesignating the paragraph (71) relating to Placer and El Dorado Counties, California, as paragraph (73); (C) by redesignating the paragraph (72) relating to Lassen, Plumas, Butte, Sierra, and Nevada Counties, California, as paragraph (74); (D) by striking the paragraph (71) relating to Indianapolis, Indiana, and inserting the following: ‘‘(75) INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA.—$6,430,000 for environmental infrastructure for Indianapolis, Indiana.’’; (E) by redesignating the paragraph (73) relating to St. Croix Falls, Wisconsin, as paragraph (76); (F) by redesignating paragraph (72), relating to Alpine, California, as paragraph (77); and (G) by adding at the end the following: ‘‘(78) ST. CLAIR COUNTY, ALABAMA.—$5,000,000 for water related infrastructure, St. Clair County, Alabama. ‘‘(79) CRAWFORD COUNTY, ARKANSAS.—$35,000,000 for water supply infrastructure, Crawford County, Arkansas. ‘‘(80) ALAMEDA AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTIES, CALIFORNIA.— $25,000,000 for recycled water treatment facilities within the East Bay Municipal Utility District service area, Alameda and Contra Costa Counties, California. ‘‘(81) ALISO CREEK, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.— $5,000,000 for water related infrastructure, Aliso Creek, Orange County, California. ‘‘(82) AMADOR COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.—$3,000,000 for wastewater collection and treatment infrastructure, Amador County, California.

VerDate Aug 31 2005

13:52 Jan 23, 2009

Jkt 059194

PO 00001

Frm 01256

Fmt 6580

Sfmt 6581

M:\STATUTES\2007\59194PT1.001

APPS10

PsN: 59194PT1