PUBLIC LAW 95-410—OCT. 3, 1978 (e) Section 621 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1621) is amended by inserting the following after 'Provided, That": "in the case of an alleged violation of section 592 of this Act arising out of gross negligence or negligence, such suit or action shall not be instituted more than five years after the date the alleged violation was committed: Provided further, That". (f)(1)(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), subsections (a), (b), and (c) (other than new subsection (e) of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as added by subsection (a)) shall be effective with respect to proceedings commenced after the 89th day after the date of enactment of this Act. (B) Except as provided in subparagraph (C), section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as such section existed on the day before the date of enactment of this Act) shall apply to any alleged intentional violation thereof involving television receivers that are the product of Japan and that were or are the subject of antidumping proceedings if the alleged intentional violation— (i) occurred before the date of enactment of this Act, and (ii) was the subject of an investigation by the Customs Service which was begun before the date of enactment of this Act. (C) Except as provided in the next sentence, subsection (e) of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as added by subsection (a)) shall be effective on the date of enactment of this Act. Notwithstanding any provision of law, in any proceeding in a United States district court commenced by the United States pursuant to section 604 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for the recovery of any monetary penalty claimed under section 592 of such Act for an alleged intentional violation described in subparagraph (B) — (i) all issues, including the amount of the penalty, shall be tried de novo; and (ii) the United States shall have the burden of proof to establish such violation by a preponderance of the evidence. (2)(A) The amendment made by subsection (e) shall apply with respect to alleged violations of section 592 of the Tariff Act of 1930 resulting from gross negligence or negligence which are committed on or after the date of the enactment of this Act. (B) In the case of any alleged violation of such section 592 resulting from gross negligence or negligence which was committed before the date of the enactment of this Act and for which no suit or action for recovery was commenced before such date of enactment, no suit or action for recovery with respect to such alleged violation shall be instituted after—• (i) the closing date of the 5-year period beginning on the date on which the alleged violation was committed, or (ii) the closing date of the 2-year period beginning on such date of enactment, whichever date later occurs, except that no such suit or action may be instituted after the date on which such suit or action would have been barred under section 621 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (as in effect on the day before such date of enactment). SEC. 111. (a) Section 607 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1607) is amended by striking out "$2,500" in the heading of such section and inserting in lieu thereof "$10,000", and by striking out "$2,500" each place that it appears therein and inserting in lieu thereof "$10,000".
92 STAT. 897
Ante, p. 893.
19 USC 1592 note,
19 USC 1604.
19 USC 1621.
�
