Page:Works of Thomas Carlyle - Volume 06.djvu/78

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been proofread, but needs to be validated.
48
INTRODUCTION

end having been completed. Mother and Wife were to live together; the Sisters had got or were getting married,—Noble’s researches and confused jottings do not say specially when: the Son, as new head of the house, an inexperienced head, but a teachable, ever-learning one, was to take his Father’s place; and with a wise Mother and a good Wife, harmonising tolerably well we shall hope, was to manage as he best might. Here he continued, unnoticeable but easily imaginable by History, for almost ten years: farming lands; most probably attending quarter-sessions; doing the civic, industrial, and social duties, in the common way;—living as his Father before him had done. His first child was born here, in October 1621; a son, Robert, baptised at St. John’s Church on the 13th of the month, of whom nothing farther is known.[1] A second child, also a son, Oliver, followed, whose baptismal date is 6th February 1623, of whom also we have almost no farther account,—except one that can be proved to be erroneous.[2] The List of his other children shall be given by and by.

1623

In October 1623, there was an illumination of tallow lights, a ringing of bells, and gratulation of human hearts in all Towns in England, and doubtless in Huntingdon too; on the safe return of Prince Charles from Spain without the Infanta.[3] A matter of endless joy to all true Englishmen of that day, though no Englishman of this day feels any interest

  1. Date of his burial discovered lately, in the old Parish-Register of Felsted in Essex; recorded in peculiar terms, and specially in the then Vicar’s hand: ‘Robertus Cromwell, Filius honorandi viri Mtis (Militis) ‘Oliveris Cromwell et Elizabethæ Uxoris ejus, sepultus fuit 31° die Maii 1639. Et Robertus fuit eximiè pius iuvenis, Deum timens supra multos.’ (See Edinburgh Review, No. 209. January 1856, p. 54.) So that Oliver’s first great loss in his Family was of this Eldest Son, then in his 18th year; not of a Younger one as was hitherto supposed. (Note of 1857.)
  2. Noble, i. 134.
  3. H. L. (Hamond l’Estrange), Reign of King Charles (London, 1656), p. 3 ‘October 5th,’ the Prince arrived.