Retail Clerks International Association, Local Unions Nos. 128 and 633 v. Lion Dry Goods, Inc./Concurrence Frankfurter

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion
Frankfurter

United States Supreme Court

369 U.S. 17

Retail Clerks International Association, Local Unions Nos. 128 and 633  v.  Lion Dry Goods, Inc.

 Argued: Jan. 17, 1962. --- Decided: Feb 26, 1962


Mr. Justice FRANKFURTER, concurring.

I wholly agree with the Court in rejecting the restrictive meaning given by the Court of Appeals to "contracts" in § 301(a) of the Labor Management Relations Act. I have, however, serious doubt whether the "statement of understanding" on the basis of which the strike was settled was in fact a contract, in the sense of a consensual arrangement between the Retail Clerks and Lion Dry Goods, rather than a formulation of the results of the intercession of a public-spirited intermediary on the basis of which each side was prepared to lay down its arms. However, on a matter of construing a particular document, in light of the surrounding circumstances, I do not desire to dissent.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse