Truax v. Corrigan

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search


Truax v. Corrigan  (1921)  by William Howard Taft
Syllabus
Court Documents
Opinion of the Court
Dissenting Opinions
Pitney
Brandeis

United States Supreme Court

257 U.S. 312

TRUAX  v.  CORRIGAN

 Argued: Oct. 5, 6, 1921. --- Decided: Dec 19, 1921

[Syllabus from pages 312-314 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Clifton Mathews, of Globe, Ariz., and E. E. Ellinwood and John Mason Ross, both of Bisbee, Ariz., for plaintiffs in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 314-317 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Jackson H. Ralston, of Washington, D. C., Wiley E. Jones, of Phoenix, Ariz., and Samuel Herrick, of Washington, D. C., for defendants in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 317-320 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).