Truax v. Corrigan

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search


Court Documents
Dissenting Opinions
Pitney
Brandeis

United States Supreme Court

257 U.S. 312

TRUAX  v.  CORRIGAN

 Argued: Oct. 5, 6, 1921. --- Decided: Dec 19, 1921

[Syllabus from pages 312-314 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Clifton Mathews, of Globe, Ariz., and E. E. Ellinwood and John Mason Ross, both of Bisbee, Ariz., for plaintiffs in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 314-317 intentionally omitted]

Messrs. Jackson H. Ralston, of Washington, D. C., Wiley E. Jones, of Phoenix, Ariz., and Samuel Herrick, of Washington, D. C., for defendants in error.

[Argument of Counsel from pages 317-320 intentionally omitted]

Mr. Chief Justice TAFT delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).