From Wikisource
[edit] 2005-12 admin
- User:AllanHaineySeems an OK guy. See our talk pages for my proposal and his responseApwoolrich 13:14, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- support ThomasV 14:27, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support—Zhaladshar (Talk) 15:17, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support Keep up the good work! Dovi 19:08, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support--BirgitteSB 19:56, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
- Support--Jusjih 10:31, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
- Strongly Support:Although I am not an active or experienced member of the Wikisource community, I have a substantial amount of knowledge and confidence that this user will exemplify the values of an administrator.--J.Steinbock (Talk Page)
[edit] 2006-12 confirmation
- Support continued adminship. —{admin} Pathoschild 05:51, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support continued sysopship. --Benn Newman (AMDG) 12:12, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support continued adminship.--BirgitteSB 13:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Spangineerwp (háblame) 16:13, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support continued adminship.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 19:45, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support continued adminship. Dovi 12:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support for continued adminship. - Politicaljunkie 14:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)
- Support continued adminship.--Jusjih 17:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Closed, administrator access confirmed. —{admin} Pathoschild 04:12, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
[edit] 2008-01 confirmation (failed)
| status |
administrator since 10 December 2005 (unanimous) |
| activity |
active (contributions, logs) |
| discussions |
|
- Oppose continued adminship, inactive and email not activated. John Vandenberg 19:20, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose keeping tools now since no editing or activity with admin tools since late April 2007. If he is active again I would gladly support re-gaining the tools. Thank you for your prior service to the Community. FloNight 19:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose; inactive.--BirgitteSB 19:56, 7 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per all above. Cowardly Lion 02:21, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Inappropriate to have an admin with no e-mail link.--Poetlister 16:40, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per all above.--Jusjih 02:52, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
- Sadly, oppose on grounds of inactivity and lack of e-mail address.—Zhaladshar (Talk) 17:00, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
Closed: Not reconfirmed. ++Lar: t/c 20:35, 2 February 2008 (UTC)