Wyoming v. Colorado (259 U.S. 419)
|Wyoming v. Colorado (259 U.S. 419)
|Laramie River. Petition for rehearing was granted, 260 U.S. 1 (1922), which revised the original decision. A motion to dismiss was later denied. 286 U.S. 494 (1932).— Excerpted from Wyoming v. Colorado on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.Wyoming v. Colorado, 259 U.S. 419 (1922), is a set of court cases, all dealing with water distribution from the|
United States Supreme Court
WYOMING v. COLORADO (259 U.S. 419)
Argued: Jan. 9, 10, 1922. --- Decided: June 5, 1922
[Syllabus from pages 419-421 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. N. E. Corthell, of Laramie, Wyo., John W. Lacey, of Cheyenne, Wyo., Douglas A. Preston, of Rock Springs, Wyo., and John D. Clark, of Cheyenne, Wyo., for State of Wyoming.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 421-430 intentionally omitted]
Messrs. Victor E. Keyes, of Denver, Colo., Delph E. Carpenter, of Greeley, Colo., and Platt Rogers, Benjamin Griffith, Julius C. Gunter, Charles F. Tew, Fred Farrar, and Leslie E. Hubbard, all of Denver, Colo., for State of Colorado.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 430-443 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Ritter, for the United States.
[Argument of Counsel from pages 443-455 intentionally omitted]
Mr. Justice VAN DEVANTER delivered the opinion of the Court.
|This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).|