Translation:Shulchan Aruch/Yoreh Deah/109
|
Contains two Seif. 1[edit]A piece that is not fit for honor, which became mixed with others of its kind, dry with dry (meaning, it is not diluted, and the prohibition stands on its own, but it became mixed and is not recognized) - one in two is nullified, and it is permitted for one person to eat each one separately, but he should not eat all three together. And there are those who forbid one person from eating them even one after the other. Note: It is proper to initially follow this practice, and some are strict to discard one or give it to a non-Jew (Rema adds: and this is just a general stringency, but all this is when it became mixed with its kind, but if not with its kind and it is not recognized, even dry with dry, one should place it aside (Tur cites in the name of Baal Haturim and many other decisors). And there is no distinction in all this whether the prohibition is Rabbinic or Biblical (Beit Yosef in the name of the decisors contrary to the Rema's note), and see later Siman Kuf-Kaf-Bet if utensils became mixed together.* 2[edit]Dry with dry that became nullified - one in two. If they are cooked [together] as one, even to eat each one separately is prohibited if there are no sixty [times the nullified substance] due to the sauce giving flavor and being absorbed in the pieces. And if one wants to cook them together and there are no sixty [times the nullified substance], it is permitted to increase upon them until sixty and to cook them, and it does not have the status of nullifying the prohibition. Note: And some say that if the mixture became known before they were cooked together, everything is permitted because they do not revert and become prohibited since they became nullified when dry (Tur in the name of the Rash and our Rabbi Yerucham in the name of the Tosafot wrote similarly, and he wrote that this is the primary opinion), and in a place of loss, one should rely on the lenient opinions and permit. |
דין יבש ביבש שנתערב ובו שני סעיפים: סעיף א[edit]חתיכה שאינה ראויה להתכבד שנתערבה באחרות מין במינה יבש ביבש (דהיינו שאין נבלל והאיסור עומד בעצמו אלא שנתערב ואינו מכירו) (ב"י בשם תשובת הרשב"א והרמב"ן וסה"ת) חד בתרי בטיל ומותר לאכלן אדם אחד כל אחת בפני עצמה אבל לא יאכל שלשתן יחד ויש מי שאוסר לאכלן אדם אחד אפילו זה אחר זה:
סעיף ב[edit]יבש ביבש שנתבטל חד בתרי אם בשלן [כולן] כאחד אפילו לאכול כל אחד בפני עצמו אסור אם אין שם שישים מפני שהרוטב בנותן טעם ונבלע בחתיכות ואם רוצה לבשלן יחד ואין שם שישים מותר להרבות עליהם כדי שיעור שישים ולבשלן ואין בו משום מבטל איסור:
|