Page:EPIC Oxford report.pdf/20

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page has been validated.

The selection criteria for articles listed in table 3.2 were as follows:

  1. The topic must be related to the academic and research interest of all the reviewers of the article.
  2. Availability of an article on the topic in both Wikipedia and the alternative encyclopaedia of choice.
  3. Length of the article on the topic in both Wikipedia and the alternative encyclopaedia of choice must be ≥1.5 pages when pasted into a MS Word document.
  4. No traces of vandalism in the article (the definition of vandalism is given in Section 3.4.2). Note: This criterion turned out to have no impact on the selection of articles for the present study.
Humanities Social Sciences Mathematics, Physics and Life Sciences Medical Sciences
ENGLISH Saint Thomas Aquinas/ Thomas Aquinas
Saint Anselm of Canterbury/ Anselm of Canterbury
Elementary/ primary education
Preschool education
Mutation
Antibiotic resistance
Attention
Memory
SPANISH Cambio Climatico
Energia Renovable
Evo Morales
Hugo Chavez
Número racional
Polinomio
Neurona
Percepción
ARABIC Middle East
Egypt
Mathematical proof
Algorithm
Parkinson's disease
Pharmacokinetics

Table 3.2 Final list of articles for review in each of the three study languages.

3.4 The Review Process

3.4.1 Development of a Feedback Questionnaire to Assess Articles

A feedback questionnaire was constructed following a literature review of current tools available to assess the quality and accuracy of written text. The feedback questionnaire was developed by the team.

It consists of 23 items that assess four key dimensions for assessing the quality of articles as follows:

  1. Intrinsic attributes of quality and accuracy
  2. Temporal attributes
  3. Style
  4. Subjective opinions

20