NND Project Number: NND 63316. By: NWD Date: 2011
SECRET
| Control: | 9200 |
| Rec'd: | June 18, 1954 |
| 12:05 p.m. |
| FROM: | Geneva |
| TO: | Secretary of State |
| NO: | DULTE 195, June 18, 3 p. m. |
PRIORITY
SENT DEPARTMENT DULTE 195, REPEATED INFORMATION PARIS 455, SAIGON 177.
PARIS EYES ONLY AMBASSADOR; SAIGON EYES ONLY AMBASSADOR
Johnson saw Chauvel this morning and discussed with him conference situation in light TEDUL 211. Johnson stated seemed to us that such fundamental questions as composition, voting procedures and authority or international control commission should be dealt with in conference rather than by committee. If conference reached decision on fundamental principles, working out of details could be done by committee of experts of principally interested parties in same pattern as present Franco-Viet Minh military conversations.
Chauvel said this would be agreeable except that question of authority, which he termed "relationship between international commission and joint committees" could be dealt with by technical committee, thus implying France not (repeat not) prepared to maintain principle of subordination joint committees to international commission. As French have already circulated proposal contained SECTO 460 through secretariat, it was agreed we would make suggestion along foregoing lines at today's restricted meeting. Chauvel said they did not (repeat not) yet have any further indication as to what attitude Chinese would take on French proposal entirely clear from conversation with Chauvel that his main interest is in keeping some conference activity of nine going and that if regardless of level representation we prepared continue some conference meetings would probably meet French point of view. Appears French proposal made on assumption that there would be complete recess of conference with departure of Smith and Eden.
Chauve1 made reference to his conversation with Smith yesterday (DULTE 193--last paragraph), making inquiry as to exactly what we had in mind. Johnson in reply read to him paragraphs 5, 6 and 7 basic instructions (TOSEC 138) stating that French willingness surrender even minimum enclave in north of Haiphong would so clearly contravene the principles which the US considered essential as to require our public dissociation with such a solution.
