Page:Sanskrit Grammar by Whitney p1.djvu/193

V.	भवन् bhávan	भवत् bhávat	अदन् ádan	अदत् ádat	जुह्वत् júhvat
Dual:
N. A. V.	भवन्तौ bhávantāu	भवन्ती bhávantī	अदन्तौ adántāu	अदती adatī́	जुह्वतौ júhvatāu	जुह्वती júhvatī
I. D. Ab.	भवद्भ्याम् bhávadbhyām		अदद्भ्याम् adádbhyām		जुह्वद्भ्याम् júhvadbhyām
G. L.	भवतोस् bhávatos		अदतोस् adatós		जुह्वतोस् júhvatos
Plural:
N. V.	भवन्तस् bhávantas	भवन्ति bhávanti	अदन्तस् adántas	अदन्ति adánti	जुह्वतस् júhvatas	जुह्वति júhvati
A.	भवतस् bhávatas	भवन्ति bhávanti	अदतस् adatás	अदन्ति adánti	जुह्वतस् júhvatas	जुह्वति júhvati
I.	भवद्भिस् bhávadbhis		अदद्भिस् adádbhis		जुह्वद्भिस् júhvadbhis
D. Ab.	भवद्भ्यस् bhávadbhyas		अदद्भ्यस् adádbhyas		जुह्वद्भ्यस् júhvadbhyas
G.	भवताम् bhávatām		अदताम् adatā́m		जुह्वताम् júhvatām
L.	भवत्सु bhávatsu		अदत्सु adátsu		जुह्वत्सु júhvatsu

a. The future participle bhaviṣyánt may form in nom. etc. dual neuter either bhaviṣyántī or bhaviṣyatī́; tudánt, either tudántī or tudatī́; yā́nt (√yā), either yā́ntī or yātī́. And júhvat, in nom. etc. plural neuter, may make also júhvanti (beside júhvati, as given in the paradigm above).

b. But these strong forms (as well as bhávantī, du., and its like from present-stems in unaccented a) are quite contrary to general analogy, and of somewhat doubtful character. No example of them is quotable, either from the older or from the later language. The cases concerned, indeed, would be everywhere of rare occurrence.

448. The Vedic derivations from the model as above given are few. The dual ending āu is only one sixth as common as ā. Anomalous accent is seen in a case or two: acodáte, rathirāyátām, and vāghádbhis (if this is a participle). The only instance in V. of nom. etc. pl. neut. is sā́nti, with lengthened ā (compare the forms in ānti, below, 451 a, 454 c); one or two examples in anti are quotable from B.