Motives for supporting William. to his father; his counsellor was the venerated Primate; chief in loyalty to him was one yet more venerated, the one native chief left to the English Church, the holy Bishop of Worcester. If the English dealt with William as an English king, he might deal with them as an English king should deal with his people. In fighting for William against the men who had risen up against him, they would be fighting for one who had not himself wronged them against the men who had done them the bitterest of wrongs. If the Bishop of Bayeux and the Bishop of Coutances, if Robert of Mortain and Robert of Mowbray, if Eustace of Boulogne and the fierce lord of Bellême, could all be smitten down by English axes or driven into banishment from the English shores, if their estates on English soil could be again parted out as the reward of English valour, the work of the Norman Conquest would indeed seem to be undone. And it would be undone none the less, although the king whose crown was made sure by English hands was himself the son of the Conqueror of England.
Loyalty of the English.
They meet in London.
With such feelings as these the sons of the soil
gathered with glee around the standard of King William.
Not a name is handed down to us. We know not from
what shires they came or under what leaders they
marched. We see only that, as was natural when the
stress of the war lay in Kent and Sussex, the trysting-place
was London.[1] How did that great city stand at
this moment with regard to the rebellion? It will be
remembered by what vigorous means Bishop William
of Durham claimed to have secured the allegiance of the
citizens some time earlier.[2] At all events, whether by
