Boland v. Raffensperger (Supreme Court of Georgia)
.jpg)
SUPREME COURT OF GEORGIA
Case No. S21M0565
December 14, 2020
The Honorable Supreme Court met pursuant to adjournment.
The following order was passed:
PAUL ANDREW BOLAND v. BRAD RAFFENSPERGER et al.
Appellant’s December 14, 2020 motion in this Court, which seeks extraordinary relief related to the notice of appeal filed in the superior court, is hereby denied.
Melton, C. J., Nahmias, P. J., and Boggs, Peterson, Warren, Bethel, Ellington, and McMillian, JJ., concur.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA
Clerk's Office, Atlanta
I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Supreme Court of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
s/Thérèse S. Barnes, Clerk
This work is in the public domain in the U.S. because it is an edict of a government, local or foreign. See § 313.6(C)(2) of the Compendium II: Copyright Office Practices. Such documents include "legislative enactments, judicial decisions, administrative rulings, public ordinances, or similar types of official legal materials" as well as "any translation prepared by a government employee acting within the course of his or her official duties."
These do not include works of the Organization of American States, United Nations, or any of the UN specialized agencies. See Compendium III § 313.6(C)(2) and 17 U.S.C. 104(b)(5).
A non-American governmental edict may still be copyrighted outside the U.S. Similar to {{PD-in-USGov}}, the above U.S. Copyright Office Practice does not prevent U.S. states or localities from holding copyright abroad, depending on foreign copyright laws and regulations.
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse