three equations are summarized, namely in the first of them on the left side, the expression
∂
H
z
′
∂
y
−
∂
H
y
′
∂
z
{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {H}}'_{z}}{\partial y}}-{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {H}}'_{y}}{\partial z}}}
.
is stated. For that, we can write with respect to (35)
[
R
o
t
′
H
′
]
x
−
1
V
2
{
p
y
∂
H
z
′
∂
t
′
−
p
z
∂
H
y
′
∂
t
′
}
{\displaystyle [Rot'\ {\mathfrak {H}}']_{x}-{\frac {1}{V^{2}}}\left\{{\mathfrak {p}}_{y}{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {H}}'_{z}}{\partial t'}}-{\mathfrak {p}}_{z}{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {H}}'_{y}}{\partial t'}}\right\}}
,
and thus for the equation itself
[
R
o
t
′
H
′
]
x
=
4
π
∂
D
x
d
t
′
+
1
V
2
∂
d
t
′
{
p
y
H
z
−
p
z
H
y
}
=
4
π
∂
D
x
′
d
t
′
{\displaystyle [Rot'\ {\mathfrak {H}}']_{x}=4\pi {\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {D}}_{x}}{dt'}}+{\frac {1}{V^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{dt'}}\left\{{\mathfrak {p}}_{y}{\mathfrak {H}}_{z}-{\mathfrak {p}}_{z}{\mathfrak {H}}_{y}\right\}=4\pi {\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {D}}'_{x}}{dt'}}}
The two other equations admit of a similar transformation, and therefore we have
R
o
t
′
H
′
=
4
π
∂
D
′
∂
t
′
{\displaystyle Rot'\ {\mathfrak {H}}'=4\pi {\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {D}}'}{\partial t'}}}
(
I
I
I
d
)
{\displaystyle III_{d})}
Furthermore, as regards the first of equations
I
V
c
{\displaystyle IV_{c}}
), this one goes over, since
∂
E
z
∂
y
−
∂
E
y
∂
z
=
[
R
o
t
′
E
]
x
−
1
V
2
{
p
y
∂
E
z
∂
t
′
−
p
z
∂
E
y
∂
t
′
}
{\displaystyle {\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {E}}_{z}}{\partial y}}-{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {E}}_{y}}{\partial z}}=[Rot'\ {\mathfrak {E}}]_{x}-{\frac {1}{V^{2}}}\left\{{\mathfrak {p}}_{y}{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {E}}_{z}}{\partial t'}}-{\mathfrak {p}}_{z}{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {E}}_{y}}{\partial t'}}\right\}}
into
[
R
o
t
′
E
]
x
=
−
∂
H
x
∂
t
′
+
1
V
2
∂
∂
t
′
{
p
y
E
z
+
p
z
E
y
}
=
−
∂
H
x
′
∂
t
′
{\displaystyle [Rot'\ {\mathfrak {E}}]_{x}=-{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {H}}_{x}}{\partial t'}}+{\frac {1}{V^{2}}}{\frac {\partial }{\partial t'}}\left\{{\mathfrak {p}}_{y}{\mathfrak {E}}_{z}+{\mathfrak {p}}_{z}{\mathfrak {E}}_{y}\right\}=-{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {H}}'_{x}}{\partial t'}}}
,
so that (
I
V
c
{\displaystyle IV_{c}}
) is equivalent with
R
o
t
′
E
=
−
∂
H
′
∂
t
′
{\displaystyle Rot'\ {\mathfrak {E}}=-{\frac {\partial {\mathfrak {H}}'}{\partial t'}}}
(
I
V
d
)
{\displaystyle (IV_{d})}
Eventually it follows from
ϰ
1
E
x
=
4
π
V
2
D
x
′
,
ϰ
2
E
y
=
4
π
V
2
D
y
′
,
ϰ
3
E
z
=
4
π
V
2
D
z
′
{\displaystyle \varkappa _{1}{\mathfrak {E}}_{x}=4\pi V^{2}{\mathfrak {D}}'_{x},\ \varkappa _{2}{\mathfrak {E}}_{y}=4\pi V^{2}{\mathfrak {D}}'_{y},\ \varkappa _{3}{\mathfrak {E}}_{z}=4\pi V^{2}{\mathfrak {D}}'_{z}}
(
V
d
)
{\displaystyle (V_{d})}
§ 58. To introduce the new variables also into the limiting conditions , we consider the perpendicular n for the considered point, and also two directions h and k that are perpendicular to one another and to n . There, the direction n shall correspond to a rotation by a right angle from h to k . Consequently it follows from (IX) (§ 56)
4
π
V
2
D
n
′
=
4
π
V
2
D
n
+
[
p
.
H
]
n
=
4
π
V
2
D
n
+
[
p
.
H
′
]
n
=
{\displaystyle 4\pi V^{2}{\mathfrak {D}}'_{n}=4\pi V^{2}{\mathfrak {D}}_{n}+[{\mathfrak {p.H}}]_{n}=4\pi V^{2}{\mathfrak {D}}_{n}+[{\mathfrak {p.H}}']_{n}=}
=
4
π
V
2
D
n
+
p
h
H
k
′
−
p
k
H
h
′
{\displaystyle =4\pi V^{2}{\mathfrak {D}}{}_{n}+{\mathfrak {p}}_{h}{\mathfrak {H}}'_{k}-{\mathfrak {p}}_{k}{\mathfrak {H}}'_{h}}
.
Now, since
D
n
,
H
k
′
{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {D}}_{n,}\ {\mathfrak {H}}'_{k}}
and
H
h
′
{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {H}}'_{h}}
are steady, then this must also be so for
D
n
′
{\displaystyle {\mathfrak {D}}'_{n}}
.