Portal talk:Children

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Portal review
Portal Children
Classification HQ
Class H: Social Sciences
Subclass Q: The Family
Classifier AdamBMorgan
Reviewer Clockery Fairfeld
Notes Was PN for literature only; repurposed into a "Child" hub portal.

Authors[edit]

I'm only adding one story per author at the moment so that this index doesn't get too overcrowded before I get the chance to add some works from authors that might be lesser known and might fall through the cracks otherwise. When adding a work try to add something the author is well known for, instead of something obscure, so that it is more easily recognizable by readers.--Xxagile (talk) 12:27, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Works[edit]

Works on Internet Archive. --Xxagile (talk) 18:14, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Organization[edit]

I think it would be good to have the works "showcased" in the templates to be validated. If anyone finds any texts to add or want to bring in there, please do. - Theornamentalist (talk) 04:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Repurposed[edit]

This has been something on my "To Do" list for a while. It was brought up and suggested in a discussion several months ago (I think a discussion about the deletion of a different portal). This portal has been moved from "Children's literature" to just "Children". The portal "Children's general fiction" has been moved into the now vacant "Children;s literature" slot (for which ti was a better match). This portal is therefore reporposed into a central hub for all Child or Children related portals. For the moment, this doesn't mean mauch change to its content but potentially several future portals (ans associated texts) can be added to the portal. This should make it wasier for users to find any- and everything child related from one page. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 18:16, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Page needs work[edit]

This is a very loooooooooooong page that has lots of info boxes to the left. Why? Seems that we are trying to be decorative at the expense of useful. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:26, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's meant to be a 'pedia-style box portal. I'm not sure why they're all stacked at the moment but I'll look into it. - AdamBMorgan (talk) 12:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]