User talk:Billinghurst

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
Those who get too big for their britches will be exposed in the end.
System-users.svg This user has alternate accounts named SDrewthbot & SDrewth.
billinghurst (talk page)

(Archives index, Last archive) IRC cloak request: I confirm that my freenode nick is sDrewth
Note: Please use informative section titles that give some indication of the message.

George Smith by John Collier.jpg

Wikisource has a number of active Wikiprojects that could use
your help in tackling these large additions to our library.


Dictionary of National Biography Project
Work: Dictionary of National Biography


Contents

TUSC token d91ad562a2ec917955d6510fb2e7bdc6 [edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Note to self (export) [edit]

(pastes from conversation)

billinghurst sDrewth 14:50, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

(notes)

  • When building Tables of contents and Lists of Illustrations, the title components need to be included within the table |+ ... as otherwise they page break after the title before table, d'oh!
  • asked Tpt about the attribution page, and how to edit, and to correct a typo
  • epubreader (reasonable in browser app for FF)

TO DO — DNB footer initials [edit]

Implementing Easier and More Efficient Metadata Tags on Wikisource [edit]

Hello, I just wanted to give you a brief update on the initiative to adopt the Schema metatags on Wikisource, I have talked to tpt and he is in support of it, and successfully made this microdata template to test the functionality of the use of microdata. Here is an example that I made that is a little closer to what this would look like in Wikisource.

If I brought this idea to an RFC, would you support its consensus? Is there any other information you would like to see in order to support it?

Maximilian.Klein.LRMI (talk) 19:36, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

ProofreadPage on FiWS [edit]

Our hard-at-work devs are making progress on a ProofreadPage bug that affects foreign language Wikisources, e.g. FiWS. They made a new bug report, number 47596, after they identified an underlying problem. Unfortunately, nobody is assigned to the bug, and progress is again stalled. There is some issue with Proofread page mixing up canonical and localized namespace names. Would you please take a look? Kindly, Heyzeuss (talk) 14:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Hiya. It shouldn't be affecting the local wiki at all in a "stopping work" sense. That bug is solely so language-imbeciles like me who cannot manage foreign language namespace can type Page: and Index: for your namespaces, etc., rather than Sivu, Keskustelu sivusta, Hakemisto and Keskustelu hakemistosta. My understanding of the bug is that it will effect all the WS wikis, so rather than them manually having to do it for each wiki, there will be an underlying component that has it, and the namespaces will be formally known by those for the language of the wiki. So if there is an issue with PrP at the wiki, it shouldn't be this. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
Three things:
  • PrP does not work as it once did. The pdf pages were a bit slow, but at least they would load up. Do you have any idea why they will not load anymore?
  • Is it possible to correct the namespaces' canonical names manually, since the needed patch to PrP is not coming soon?
  • Some of my work has been lost in the process of correcting namespace numbers. The index pages have been recreated, but the table of contents that I made, which took some time, is no longer there. Is there anyone who has both the expertise and the time to recover some of it, starting with index pages (1 & 2)? Heyzeuss (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
I am going to have to sit and ponder this. — billinghurst sDrewth 02:19, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
No worries. :) Heyzeuss (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

{{Gap}} [edit]

"it was right this way" Why? There is already the "he" interwiki on the documentation subpage. --DixonD (talk) 14:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

there is nothing wrong with <onlyinclude>, so it was right that way, and no specification for the change. — billinghurst sDrewth 15:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
In this particular case changing <onlyinclude> to <includeonly> or back doesn't change anything. The main intention was to remove duplicate "he" wiki. Should I comment every obvious edit in order for it not to be reverted? --DixonD (talk) 16:20, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Comments are always helpful, especially to semi-protected and widely-used templates. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:55, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Tech news — 2013, week 21 [edit]

Tech news prepared by tech ambassadors and posted by Global message deliveryContributeTranslateGet helpGive feedbackUnsubscribe • 19:10, 20 May 2013 (UTC)