1911 Encyclopædia Britannica/Jehoiakim

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

JEHOIAKIM (Heb. “ Yahlwehl raiseth up ”), in the Bible, son of Josiah (q. v.) and king of Judah (2 Kings xxiii. 34-xxiv.6). On the defeat of Josiah at Megiddo his younger brother Jehoahaz Egyptian (or Shallum) was chosen by the Judaeans, but the conquer er Necho summoned him to his headquarters at Riblah (south of appointing in his stead Eliakim, whose name (“ El [God] raiseth up ”) was changed to its better-known synonym, Jehoiakim. For a time Jehoiakim remained under the protection of Necho and paid heavy tribute; but with the rise of the new Chaldean Empire under Nebuchadrezzar II., and the overthrow of Egypt at the battle of Carchemish (605 B.C.) a vital change occurred. After three years of allegiance the king revolted. Invasions follcwed by Chaldeans, Syrians, Moabites and Aminonites, perhaps the advance troops dispatched by the Babylonian king; the power of Egypt was broken and the whole land came into the hands of Nebuchadrezzar. It was at the close of Jehoiakim's reign, apparently just before his death, that the enemy appeared at the gates of Jerusalem, and although he himself “ slept with his fathers ” his young son was destined to see the first captivity of the land of Judah (597 B.c.). (See JEHOIACHIN.), Wlhich “ three years " (2 Kings xxiv. 1) are intended is disputed; it is uncertain whether Judah suffered in 605 B.C. (Berossus in Jos. c. Ap. i. 19) or was left unharrned (Jos. Ant. x. 6. 1); perhaps Nebuchadrezzar made his first inroad against Judah in 602 B.C. because of its intrigue with Egypt (H. /Vinckler, Keilinschrift. u. d. alte Test., pp. 107 seq.), and the three years of allegiance extends to 599. The chronicler's tradition (2 Chron. xxxvi. 5-8) speaks of Jehoiakim's captivity, apparently confusing him with Jehoiachin. The Septuagint, however, still preserves there the record of his peaceful death, in agreement with the earlier source in 2 Kings, but against the rophecy of Jeremiah (xxii. 18 seq., xxxvi. 30), which is accepted by Jos. Ant. x. 6. 3. The different traditions can scarcely be reconciled. Nothing certain is known of the marauding bands sent against éehoiakim; for Syrians (Aram) one would expect Edomites (Edom), ut see Jer. xxxv. II; some recension's of the Septuagint even include the “ Samaritans ”l (For further references to this reign see especially JEREMIAH; see also Jaws: History, § 17.)  (S. A. C.)