United States v. Willow River Power Company

United States v. Willow River Power Company
by Robert H. Jackson

Syllabus

United States v. Willow River Power Co., 324 U.S. 499 (1945) is a 1945 decision of the U.S. Supreme Court involving the question whether the United States was liable under the Fifth Amendment for a “taking” of private property for a public purpose when it built a dam on navigable waters that raised the water level upstream to lessen the head of water at a power company’s dam, thereby decreasing the production of power by the company’s hydroelectric turbines. The Court’s opinion is notable because it asks the question whether the courts will provide a remedy because a property right has been invaded or a property right exists because the courts will enforce it. This is a reformulation of the Euthyphro dilemma found in Plato's dialogue Euthyphro. Warning: template has been deprecated.

899048United States v. Willow River Power Company — SyllabusRobert H. Jackson

Court Documents

Opinion of the Court

Dissenting Opinion: Roberts

Wikipedia article

United States Supreme Court

324 U.S. 499

United States v. Willow River Power Company

Argued: Feb. 8, 9, 1945. --- Decided: March 26, 1945

Mr. Paul A. Freund, of Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Mr. R. M. Rieser, of Madison, Wis., for respondent.

Mr. Justice JACKSON delivered the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse

United States v. Willow River Power Company

Notes[edit]

Navigation menu

Search