Cole v. Arkansas (333 U.S. 196)

From Wikisource
(Redirected from 333 U.S. 196)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

For works with similar titles, see Cole v. Arkansas.
Cole v. Arkansas, 333 U.S. 196 (1948)
by the Supreme Court of the United States

United States Supreme Court

333 U.S. 196

Cole et al.  v.  Arkansas

Certiorari to the Supreme Court of Arkansas

No. 373.  Argued: February 4–5, 1948. --- Decided: March 8, 1948.

Court Documents

Petitioners were tried in a state court under an information charging them only with a violation of § 2 of a state statute, making it an offense to promote an unlawful assemblage. The trial court instructed the jury that they were charged with an offense under § 2; and they were convicted. They appealed to the State Supreme Court, contending, inter alia, that § 2 was contrary to the Federal Constitution. Without passing on that question, the State Supreme Court sustained their convictions on the ground that the information charged and the evidence showed that petitioners had violated § 1 of the same statute, which describes the distinct offense of using force and violence. Held: Petitioners were denied due process of law and the judgment is reversed and remanded to the State Supreme Court for further proceedings. Pp. 197–202.

(a) It is as much a violation of.due process to send an accused to prison following a conviction of a charge on which he was never tried as it would be to convict him upon a charge that was never made. P. 201.
(b) To conform to due process of law, petitioners were entitled to have the validity of their convictions appraised on consideration of the case as it was tried and as the issues were determined in the trial court. P. 202.

211 Ark. 836, 202 S.W.2d 770, reversed

[p197] Petitioners were tried and convicted of a violation of § 2 of a state statute. Their convictions were affirmed by the Supreme Court of Arkansas on the ground that they had violated § 1, describing a separate and distinct offense. 211 Ark. 836, 202 S.W.2d 770. This Court granted certiorari. 332 U.S. 834. Reversed and remanded, p. 202.

David Rein, and Joseph Forer argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief was Lee Pressman.

Oscar E. Ellis, Assistant Attorney General of Arkansas, and Shields M. Goodwin argued the cause for respondent. With Mr. Ellis on the brief was Guy E. Williams, Attorney General.

Mr. Justice Black delivered the opinion of the Court.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse