Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump’s election

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump’s election (2019)
Claire L. Adida, Adeline Lo and Melina R. Platas, edited by Bryan L. Sykes
4295019Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump’s election2019Claire L. Adida, Adeline Lo and Melina R. Platas

RESEARCH ARTICLE
Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump’s election

Claire L. Adida1☯, Adeline Lo 2☯*, Melina R. Platas3☯

1 Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America,
2 Department of Political Science, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America,
3 Division of Social Science, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

☯ These authors contributed equally to this work.
* aylo@wisc.edu


Abstract

What types of refugees do Americans prefer for admission into the United States? Scholars have explored the immigrant characteristics that appeal to Americans and the characteristics that Europeans prioritize in asylum-seekers, but we currently do not know which refugee characteristics Americans prefer. We conduct a conjoint experiment on a representative sample of 1800 US adults, manipulating refugee attributes in pairs of Syrian refugee profiles, and ask respondents to rate each refugee’s appeal. Our focus on Syrian refugees in a 2016 survey experiment allows us to speak to the concurrent refugee crisis on the eve of a polarizing election, while also identifying religious discrimination, holding constant the refugee’s national origin. We find that Americans prefer Syrian refugees who are female, high-skilled, English-speaking, and Christian, suggesting they prioritize refugee integration into the U.S. labor and cultural markets. We find that the preference for female refugees is not driven by the desire to exclude Muslim male refugees, casting doubt that American preferences at the time were motivated by security concerns. Finally, we find that anti-Muslim bias in refugee preferences varies in magnitude across key subgroups, though it prevails across all sample demographics.


OPEN ACCESS

Citation: Adida CL, Lo A, Platas MR (2019) Americans preferred Syrian refugees who are female, English-speaking, and Christian on the eve of Donald Trump’s election. PLoS ONE 14(10): e0222504. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222504

Editor: Bryan L. Sykes, University of California-Irvine, UNITED STATES

Received: May 2, 2019

Accepted: September 2, 2019

Published: October 10, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Adida et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability Statement: All relevant data available in the paper and its Supporting Information files as well as from github at https://github.com/adelinelo/refugee-conjoint.

Funding: This study is funded by an National Science Foundation RAPID Collaborative grant SES-1503802 (www.nsf.gov) and by the University of California, San Diego Academic Senate RP56G (www.ucsd.edu) under author C.A. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.


This work is released under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 license, which allows free use, distribution, and creation of derivatives, so long as the license is unchanged and clearly noted, and the original author is attributed.

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse