Branigin v. Duddleston/Opinion of the Court
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.
Mr. Justice HARLAN, for reasons contained in his memorandum of March 4, 1968 (390 U.S. 932, 88 S.Ct. 1016, 19 L.Ed.2d 1124, sub nom. Branigin v. Grills), in which he acquiesced in the denial of stays of enforcement of the District Court's judgment, also acquiesces in the Court's affirmance of that judgment.
Notes[edit]
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse