From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

United States Supreme Court

22 U.S. 529


March 16th.

Mr. Emmett moved for a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue to the Circuit Court for the District of Columbia, commanding that Court to restore one [[../]], an attorney of that Court, who had been suspended from practice for one year, by order of that Court. [a] March 17th.

Mr. Chief Justice MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the Court.


^a  Mr. Emmett cited Tidd's Pract. 59. 1 Johns. Cas. 134. 181. Bac. Abr. tit. Mandamus.

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).