Bushnell v. Crooke Mining Smelting Company (150 U.S. 82)/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search

United States Supreme Court

150 U.S. 82

Bushnell  v.  Crooke Mining Smelting Company


We should not have been called on to reiterate the rule that an application for a rehearing cannot be entertained when presented after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch, 1; Browder v. McArthur, 7 Wheat. 58; Sibald v. U.S., 12 Pet. 488; Brooks v. Railroad Co., 102 U.S. 107; Williams v. Conger, 131 U.S. 390 9 Sup. Ct. Rep. 793. Application denied.

Notes

[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse