Davenport City v. Dows/Opinion of the Court

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
Davenport City v. Dows by Salmon P. Chase
Opinion of the Court
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court

United States Supreme Court

82 U.S. 390

DAVENPORT CITY  v.  DOWS


The question in this case is, whether the laws for collection of taxes imposed by the city of Davenport are revenue laws of the State of Iowa.

We do not think that the ordinances of municipal corporations levying taxes can be classed as revenue laws of a State. Congress seems to have intended to give to the State the right to preference in hearing when itself a party to a cause pending in this court, and a like preference when the execution of the revenue laws of a State is enjoined or suspended, to any party claiming under such laws. This preference is given, plainly enough, because of the presumed importance of such cases to the administration and internal welfare of the States, and because of their dignity as equal members of the Union. The reasons for preference do not apply to municipal corporations, more than to railroad and many other corporations.

Nothing is shown to us which requires the advancement of the cause on account of special and peculiar circumstances.

MOTION DENIED.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).