Davis v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company/Concurrence Harlan

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Harlan
Stewart

United States Supreme Court

379 U.S. 671

Davis  v.  Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Company


Mr. Justice HARLAN, concurring.

I continue to hold the views first expressed in my separate opinion in Rogers v. Missouri Pac. R. Co., 352 U.S. 500, 559-562, 77 S.Ct. 443, 478-479, 1 L.Ed.2d 493, and frequently reiterated since: [*] (1) cases of this kind are not the proper business of this Court; (2) once accepted for review, however, by the votes of at least four members of the Court, I deem it my duty to participate in their decision. On this basis I join the opinion of the Court.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).