Douglas v. Alabama/Concurrence Stewart

From Wikisource
Jump to navigation Jump to search
927114Douglas v. Alabama — ConcurrencePotter Stewart
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinions
Harlan
Stewart

United States Supreme Court

380 U.S. 415

Douglas  v.  Alabama

 Argued: March 9 and 10, 1965. --- Decided: April 5, 1965


Mr. Justice STEWART, concurring in the result.

The Court says that what happened in this case violated the petitioner's 'rights under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment as applied to the States.' I concur in the Court's judgment, because I think the petitioner was deprived of his liberty without due process of law in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. This difference in view is, of course, far more than a matter of mere semantics. See my opinion concurring in the result in Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S., p. 409, 85 S.Ct., p. 1071.

Notes[edit]

This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).

Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse