Durfee v. Duke/Concurrence Black

From Wikisource
Jump to: navigation, search
Court Documents
Case Syllabus
Opinion of the Court
Concurring Opinion

United States Supreme Court

375 U.S. 106

Durfee  v.  Duke

 Argued: Oct. 24, 1963. --- Decided: Dec 2, 1963

Mr. Justice BLACK, concurring.

Petitioners and respondents dispute the ownership of a tract of land adjacent to the Missouri River, which is the boundary between Nebraska and Missouri. Resolution of this question turns on Whether the land is in Nebraska or Missouri. Neither State, of course, has power to make a determination binding on the other as to which State the land is in. U.S.Const. Art. III, § 2; 28 U.S.C. § 1251(a). However, in a private action brought by these Nebraska petitioners, the Nebraska Supreme Court has held that the disputed tract is in Nebraska. In the present suit, brought by this Missouri respondent in Missouri, the United States Court of Appeals has refused to be bound by the Nebraska court's judgment. I concur in today's reversal of the Court of Appeals' judgment, but with the understanding that we are not deciding the question whether the respondent would continue to be bound by the Nebraska judgment should it later be authoritatively decided, either in an original proceeding between the States in this Court or by a compact between the two States under Art. I, § 10, that the disputed tract is in Missouri.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work of the United States federal government (see 17 U.S.C. 105).